Contact: +1 213 261 7589 | | More Contact Details | Not for profits click here

Performance League tables - Top 10s

Total Savings by Member The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each memebr in each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Jessica Ingram Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £762857
2nd Place David Henderson University of Glasgow £477483
3rd Place Mary Gill University of Tasmania £340607
4 Christine The University of Queensland £323399
5 charlie bull Cardiff Metropolitan University £313695
6 Estates Facilities Team Nottingham Trent University £292852
7 Edgar University College London £240539
8 Andrew Mouat Glasgow City Council £240354
9 Alexander Ford The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust £218627
10 Paul Britton University of Salford £183116

Total Savings The total value (£) of procurement and waste avoidance. This measure illustrates how much each organisation has saved while they have been using the Warp It system. The longer the organisation has been on the system the higher the savings, generally. Use this metric to better understand how the length of time a system has been operating, and the relative time to achieve behaviour change in the staff body affects savings.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University College London £2489936
2nd Place University of Kent £1453923
3rd Place University of Glasgow £1318648
4 University of Tasmania £1257031
5 University of Cambridge £1229636
6 The University of Queensland £981205
7 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £904064
8 Hywel Dda University Health Board £723769
9 University of Oxford £676323
10 University of Nottingham £642850

Total Savings Per Month The total savings per month is total savings divided by the number of months the organisation has been using the system. This metric better reflects the actual relative performance of an organisation. Use this metric to estimate how much you might save per month in a highly functioning system.
Click on this icon to view in depth details of how the savings are worked out

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place Griffith University £42500
2nd Place Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £39307
3rd Place University College London £15759
4 British Heart Foundation £15150
5 Cardiff Metropolitan University £14167
6 University of Kent £12218
7 Cardiff University £12048
8 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust £11369
9 University of Tasmania £11027
10 University of Glasgow £9352

Return On Investment This metric shows how many times an organisation has saved the amount invested in the system over the year/s. That is - how many times the system has paid for itself. Use this metric to get a insight into how likely it is that the system will be financially risk free for your organisation!
Click on this icon to view The price for a Warp It subscription

PlaceOrganisationROI
1st Place University College London 597.97 x
2nd Place University of Kent 511.22 x
3rd Place University of Tasmania 441.99 x
4 University of Glasgow 316.68 x
5 University of Cambridge 295.30 x
6 The University of Queensland 235.64 x
7 Queen's University Belfast 217.95 x
8 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 211.22 x
9 Griffith University 194.27 x
10 University of Reading 183.84 x

Carbon Saved Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationCO2 Savings KG
1st Place University College London 1277540
2nd Place University of Kent 770391
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 697286
4 University of Cambridge 656103
5 University of Glasgow 644127
6 City of Edinburgh Council 574653
7 University of Tasmania 512153
8 The University of Queensland 496193
9 University of Oxford 297942
10 University of Nottingham 281762

Waste Avoided Click on this icon to view an explanation of this metric

PlaceOrganisationWaste Avoided KG
1st Place University of Kent 278748
2nd Place University of Glasgow 241638
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 187866
4 City of Edinburgh Council 174563
5 University of Tasmania 156748
6 University College London 156228
7 University of Cambridge 114285
8 The University of Queensland 109947
9 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure 109703
10 University of Nottingham 107534

Total Members This metric is the number of members each organisation has on their Warp It portal. As you can see the more members an organisation has the more likelihood that they will have an effective system.

PlaceOrganisationTotal Members
1st Place South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5075
2nd Place University College London 4921
3rd Place University of Cambridge 3156
4 NHS Grampian 3049
5 University of Oxford 2423
6 Imperial College London 2273
7 University of Reading 2100
8 The University of Queensland 2008
9 The University of Leeds 1948
10 University of Glasgow 1930

Trades Per Month This metric is a reflection of the average number of trades a month. As you can see the higher number of trades generally means higher savings. However this is not always the case as many organisations use the system to trade low value but high volume items like stationery.

PlaceOrganisationTrades Per Month
1st Place Griffith University 97
2nd Place LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 76
3rd Place Hywel Dda University Health Board 47
4 University of Kent 47
5 East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust 38
6 University of Glasgow 34
7 University of Tasmania 28
8 University College London 27
9 The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust 23
10 Southern Health and Social Care Trust 20

Savings Per Member This metric shows the value that each member can bring to your organisation. Use this figure to work out what your savings might be if you can get say, 500 staff onto your system. Or 1000! Or 10,000!

PlaceOrganisationTotal Savings
1st Place University of Strathclyde £7778
2nd Place West Midlands Police £4766
3rd Place British Heart Foundation £3788
4 Glasgow City Council £3405
5 Cardiff Metropolitan University £2297
6 Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure £2272
7 Stevenage Bioscience Catalyst £2230
8 University of Technology Sydney £2091
9 An Post £1448
10 University of Hertfordshire £1066

Donated To Charity This metric shows the top 10 donating organisation and the value of goods they have passed to charity.

PlaceOrganisationDonated To Charity
1st Place Hywel Dda University Health Board £564784
2nd Place City of Edinburgh Council £532993
3rd Place Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS Foundation Trust £256332
4 University College London £232419
5 University of Glasgow £194757
6 University of Kent £144869
7 Royal Devon University Healthcare £105724
8 Shropshire Council £105128
9 Swansea University £71818
10 Aberdeenshire Council £71746

Quickest Payback This metric shows the top 10 organisation who achieved payback quickest. That is the time it took from signing up to when the system paid the subscription cost. You can use this metric to get an idea on how quickly you might recover your organisation's investment.

PlaceOrganisationNo Of days until payback
1st Place NHS Tayside 9
2nd Place Royal Veterinary College 15
3rd Place The University of Queensland 18
4 LEICESTERSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST 30
5 University of Exeter 31
6 University of Technology Sydney 36
7 DORSET HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 39
8 City of Parramatta 40
9 Griffith University 40
10 Swansea University 41

Large Charity Donates The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place The Edinburgh Remakery £1798053
2nd Place East Midlands Charities £651742
3rd Place Welsh Charities £626160
4 West Midlands Charities £578233
5 National Charities £569839
6 South East Charities £498766
7 Scottish Charities £308827
8 North East Charities £230077
9 Yorkshire Charities £212422
10 City of Edinburgh Council Reuse Partners £193150

Small Charity Donations The following top 10 have achieved the most value items from the system.

PlaceOrganisationAmount Given
1st Place Rom valley based charity £172730
2nd Place Kelso based charity £132766
3rd Place Whitby based charity £80034
4 MANCHESTER based charity £23342
5 Alva based charity £8612
6 Southampton based charity £6390
7 London based charity £6098
8 Lanark based charity £4468
9 Ingleby Barwick based charity £4320
10 Glasgow based charity £3942

What our customers are saying



Absolutely fantastic

Anon, University of Kent

Great idea! 

Well executed!

Anon, Isle of Wight NHS Trust

Wonderful idea and well organised!!

Anon, University of Tasmania